{"id":324,"date":"2026-08-28T05:02:36","date_gmt":"2026-08-28T05:02:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.fullarchmasters.com\/articles\/training-dental-hygienists-implants"},"modified":"2026-08-28T05:02:36","modified_gmt":"2026-08-28T05:02:36","slug":"training-dental-hygienists-implants","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fullarchmasters.com\/articles\/training-dental-hygienists-implants","title":{"rendered":"How to Train Hygienists for Full-Arch Implant Maintenance"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>Written by: Ryan Dunlop, CEO and Founder of Full Arch Masters and graduate from the Harvard School of Dental Medicine<\/em><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"key-takeaways\">Key Takeaways<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Standard implant maintenance CE leaves hygienists unprepared for screw-retained full-arch prosthetics, which increases peri-implant disease risk and limits practice revenue.<\/li>\n<li>The FAM Method delivers a seven-step training framework that defines hygienist roles, required inputs, and handoff points from preoperative records through FP1-specific workflow scaling.<\/li>\n<li>Material-specific instrumentation and photogrammetry record review are essential for safe maintenance of titanium abutments, zirconia frameworks, and PMMA provisionals without damaging restoration surfaces.<\/li>\n<li>Structured post-operative recall schedules every 3 to 6 months and hygienist-delivered home-care instruction reduce peri-implantitis incidence and keep dentists focused on billable procedures.<\/li>\n<li>Credentialing your hygiene team through <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fullarchmasters.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Full Arch Masters<\/a> with AGD PACE-approved training supports predictable growth in full-arch case volume.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>7-Step Maintenance Protocol for Screw-Retained Full-Arch Prosthetics<\/h2>\n<p>The seven steps below form the FAM Method training framework for hygienist delegation within a full-arch workflow. Each step maps to a distinct phase of the case, from first patient contact through long-term maintenance and workflow scaling.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Preoperative records and data acquisition<\/strong>, where the hygienist captures baseline clinical data, peri-implant tissue status, and patient health history inputs before any digital workflow step begins.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Photogrammetry and intraoral scanning<\/strong>, where the hygienist assists with or performs intraoral scanning and photogrammetry capture so implant position data is accurate before it enters the design pipeline.<\/li>\n<li><strong>CBCT and digital treatment planning<\/strong>, where the hygienist reviews CBCT outputs with the clinical team, flags anatomical risk factors, and confirms that planning data aligns with the patient\u2019s peri-implant health status.<\/li>\n<li><strong>exocad design<\/strong>, where the hygienist understands prosthetic design parameters such as emergence profiles, access channel locations, and tissue clearance so maintenance instrumentation matches the final restoration geometry.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Immediate-load conversion<\/strong>, where the hygienist supports same-day delivery workflows, documents tissue response at delivery, and initiates the post-operative maintenance schedule.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Final zirconia design and finishing<\/strong>, where the hygienist understands zirconia and PMMA surface characteristics to select appropriate instruments and air-polishing parameters at recall visits.<\/li>\n<li><strong>FP1-specific design, team implementation, and workflow scaling<\/strong>, where the hygienist integrates into the full-team delegation model, executes FP1-specific maintenance protocols, and supports case volume growth through a defined recall system.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h2>Why Hygienists Can Safely Maintain Full-Arch Implants<\/h2>\n<p>The American College of Prosthodontists (ACP) Position Statement on Maintenance of Full-Arch Implant Restorations states that professional hygiene for well-functioning full-arch restorations is performed with the restoration in place. The ACP specifies that clinicians should use instruments and techniques appropriate for implant surfaces and the prosthetic superstructure, rather than removing the prosthesis at each recall visit. Hygienists can clean implants safely when they receive training on the surface materials, access geometries, and instrumentation requirements of screw-retained full-arch prosthetics.<\/p>\n<p>The core safety issue centers on training, not on hygienist capability. Standard single-unit CE rarely addresses zirconia and PMMA surface hardness, access channel locations, tissue clearance beneath the prosthesis, or the photogrammetry records that define the implant positions under the restoration. A hygienist trained only on single-unit protocols lacks the clinical map needed to navigate these variables confidently.<\/p>\n<p>Structured post-operative schedules with frequent initial visits and then maintenance every 3 to 6 months based on patient risk are especially important in full-arch implant therapy. Extensive prosthetic surfaces increase hygiene challenges and demand a hygienist who can execute each visit independently, without pulling the dentist in to manage instrumentation decisions.<\/p>\n<h2>Step 1: Preoperative Records and Data Acquisition<\/h2>\n<p>Preoperative records form the clinical foundation for every downstream workflow decision in the FAM Method. The hygienist\u2019s role at this stage is to capture complete baseline data such as peri-implant probing depths, bleeding on probing, plaque index, medical history review, and documentation of any existing restorations or prior implant complications.<\/p>\n<p>The ACP emphasizes the importance of assessing peri-implant tissue health and monitoring bone levels during maintenance appointments for full-arch implant patients. These assessments fall within the hygienist\u2019s scope when they are trained to interpret findings in the context of a full-arch restoration.<\/p>\n<p>The handoff from Step 1 to Step 2 is a complete, documented baseline record that the clinical team can use to confirm that photogrammetry and scanning data match the patient\u2019s current tissue status. In a solo-dentist model, the hygienist captures records and hands off directly to the dentist. In a full-team model, the hygienist hands off to a trained records assistant or directly into the digital workflow queue, which sets up photogrammetry as the next logical step in the process.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fullarchmasters.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Learn the complete preoperative protocol at Full Arch Masters.<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Step 2: Photogrammetry and Intraoral Scanning<\/h2>\n<p>Photogrammetry separates a fully digital full-arch workflow from a hybrid one. The iCam4D photogrammetry system captures implant positions with an accuracy that intraoral scanners alone cannot achieve across a full arch, and that data drives the prosthetic design. A hygienist who understands what photogrammetry captures and why it matters can assist with or perform scanning steps, flag scan errors early, and communicate with the lab about record quality.<\/p>\n<p>The hygienist\u2019s role at Step 2 is to verify scan body placement, confirm that photogrammetry capture is complete before the patient leaves the chair, and document the scan outputs in the patient record. The handoff point is a verified digital record that combines the photogrammetry file and intraoral scan, which the clinical team can import directly into the treatment planning software.<\/p>\n<p>In a solo-dentist model, the hygienist\u2019s scanning role may focus on assistance and documentation. In a full-team model, a trained hygienist or records assistant can perform the scanning independently, which frees the dentist for surgical or restorative work and supports higher case volume without extra dentist chair time.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fullarchmasters.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Deepen your team\u2019s photogrammetry skills with Full Arch Masters training.<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Step 3: CBCT and Digital Treatment Planning<\/h2>\n<p>CBCT imaging provides the three-dimensional anatomical data that surgical planning requires. The hygienist\u2019s role at Step 3 is not to read the CBCT independently but to understand what the imaging reveals about bone volume, anatomical landmarks, and implant proximity to critical structures. That information directly affects which maintenance instruments are safe and how aggressively tissue can be probed at recall visits.<\/p>\n<p>Patients with a history of periodontitis face an increased risk of peri-implant bone loss without structured maintenance, and CBCT baseline data becomes the reference for bone level changes at later radiographic intervals. A hygienist who has reviewed the CBCT outputs with the clinical team understands the patient\u2019s anatomical risk profile before the first maintenance visit.<\/p>\n<p>The handoff from Step 3 is a treatment plan that includes implant positions, angulations, and prosthetic design parameters the hygienist will need when selecting instruments at maintenance. In a full-team model, this handoff is documented in the patient record so any hygienist covering a recall visit can access the same planning data.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fullarchmasters.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Master CBCT interpretation for hygienists through Full Arch Masters.<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Step 4: exocad Design for Long-Term Maintenance Access<\/h2>\n<p>The prosthetic design in exocad determines the geometry of the restoration the hygienist will maintain for the life of the implants. Emergence profiles, access channel locations, tissue clearance beneath the prosthesis, and the contour of the intaglio surface all influence which instruments can reach which surfaces and at what angles.<\/p>\n<p>The hygienist does not need to operate exocad. They need to understand the design outputs well enough to read a prosthetic design report, identify access channel locations on a printed model or digital rendering, and select instrumentation that matches the restoration geometry. <a href=\"https:\/\/pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/articles\/PMC13350299\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noindex nofollow\">A retrospective analysis of screw-retained monolithic zirconia complete-arch fixed implant-supported prostheses identified technical complications associated with factors such as insufficient vertical prosthetic space and impression discrepancies<\/a>. A hygienist familiar with these design parameters can flag emerging issues during maintenance when tissue changes begin to affect prosthetic seating.<\/p>\n<p>The handoff from Step 4 is a design summary in the patient record that lists access channel locations, material specifications, and any design features that affect maintenance instrumentation. This document travels with the patient through every subsequent recall visit.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fullarchmasters.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">See how exocad design ties into maintenance in the Full Arch Masters curriculum.<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Step 5: Immediate-Load Conversion and Home-Care Launch<\/h2>\n<p>Same-day delivery marks the start of the maintenance timeline. The hygienist\u2019s role at Step 5 is to document tissue response at delivery, confirm that the patient has received home-care instruction for cleaning beneath the prosthesis, and schedule the post-operative maintenance sequence before the patient leaves the chair.<\/p>\n<p>The structured post-operative schedule described earlier begins at delivery and is managed by the hygiene team. A hygienist who is present at or briefed on the immediate-load conversion understands the tissue baseline at delivery, which makes the initial post-operative assessment clinically meaningful rather than a generic check-in.<\/p>\n<p>For full-arch bridges, patients need three specialized tools that work together to access different areas beneath the prosthesis. A water flosser with a curved or angled tip reaches posterior implant sites, interdental brushes with a curved neck clean interproximal spaces, and super floss with a stiffened end threads through tight anterior contacts. All three should be used at least once daily, preferably before bed, to limit overnight biofilm accumulation. Home-care instruction at delivery, led by the hygienist, becomes the first intervention in a maintenance system that continues for the life of the implants.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fullarchmasters.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Train your hygienists to own immediate-load home-care instruction.<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Step 6: Final Zirconia Delivery and Instrumentation Protocols<\/h2>\n<p>Placement of the final zirconia restoration requires a shift in the hygienist\u2019s maintenance protocol. Zirconia and PMMA have different hardness values, surface textures, and responses to instrumentation than the provisional materials used during healing.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/dimensionsofdentalhygiene.com\/questions\/choosing-an-instrument-for-implant-maintenance\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noindex nofollow\">Hygienists should use plastic or medical-grade titanium instruments rather than stainless steel scalers on implant restorations to avoid surface scratches that are thought to promote plaque biofilm accumulation, although the link to increased peri-implant disease has not been confirmed in clinical studies.<\/a> On zirconia surfaces, the main concern involves protecting the titanium abutment or bonded titanium base beneath the zirconia framework. <a href=\"https:\/\/pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/articles\/PMC13350299\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noindex nofollow\">The standardized bonding protocol at zirconia and titanium interfaces, which uses airborne-particle abrasion plus MDP-containing adhesive resin cement, produces mechanically reliable unions<\/a>. Aggressive instrumentation at the abutment margin should not disrupt these interfaces.<\/p>\n<p>The handoff from Step 6 is an updated patient record that documents the final restoration material, delivery date, and the instrumentation protocol selected for ongoing maintenance. This record replaces the provisional-phase protocol and becomes the standing maintenance reference.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fullarchmasters.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Learn material-specific instrumentation strategies at Full Arch Masters.<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Step 7: FP1 Design, Team Training, and Workflow Scaling<\/h2>\n<p>FP1 restorations, which replace only the crowns without replacing gingival tissue, present a distinct maintenance challenge compared to FP2 and FP3 designs. Tissue clearance differs, access geometry changes, and the aesthetic demands on the prosthetic surface increase the consequences of instrumentation choices. A hygienist trained only on FP2 or FP3 protocols is not automatically prepared for FP1.<\/p>\n<p>At Step 7, the hygienist\u2019s role expands from individual patient maintenance to team implementation and workflow scaling. This expansion includes executing FP1-specific maintenance protocols, training other team members on the delegation model, and contributing to the practice\u2019s recall system in a way that supports case volume growth. Training dental hygienists is identified as one of the fundamental pillars for reducing the incidence of peri-implantitis in implant patients, and at scale, that training must be systematized across the team rather than held by a single clinician.<\/p>\n<p>In a full-team model, Step 7 is where the FAM Method\u2019s one-team, one-workflow principle becomes operationally real. Every hygienist on the team executes the same protocol, documents to the same standard, and hands off to the same clinical queue. That consistency allows a practice to run more full-arch cases per week without the maintenance system becoming a bottleneck and sets the stage for a deeper focus on instrumentation details.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"text-align: center\"><video src=\"https:\/\/cdn.aigrowthmarketer.co\/1782330219919-bc8c0ac4c3da.mp4\" style=\"max-height: 500px\" autoplay=\"\" loop=\"\" muted=\"\" playsinline=\"\"><\/video><figcaption><em>Full Arch Masters alumni deliver same-day teeth in 2 to 4 hours and report adding $1M+ per year to practice revenue.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fullarchmasters.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Get AGD PACE-approved training for your entire team.<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Instrumentation for Titanium Abutments and Full-Arch Surfaces<\/h2>\n<p>Material-specific instrumentation often represents the most common point of failure in hygienist-led full-arch maintenance. The three primary surfaces encountered in screw-retained full-arch restorations, titanium abutments, zirconia frameworks, and PMMA provisionals, each require a tailored approach.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Titanium abutments<\/strong> are susceptible to surface scratching from stainless steel instruments, which creates micro-roughness that accelerates biofilm accumulation. <a href=\"https:\/\/dimensionsofdentalhygiene.com\/questions\/choosing-an-instrument-for-implant-maintenance\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noindex nofollow\">Hygienists should use plastic or medical-grade titanium instruments rather than stainless steel scalers on implant restorations to avoid surface scratches that are thought to promote plaque biofilm accumulation, although the link to increased peri-implant disease has not been confirmed in clinical studies.<\/a> Carbon-fiber and PEEK-tipped instruments also work well on titanium surfaces.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Zirconia frameworks<\/strong> are highly scratch-resistant, but the bonded titanium base beneath the zirconia is not. Instrumentation at the prosthetic margin should avoid the titanium and zirconia interface. Air polishing with glycine powder is safe on zirconia surfaces when applied correctly. Manufacturer guidelines recommend an appropriate operating distance, continuous sweeping motions, and short durations per site while avoiding direct application toward the gingival margin or into periodontal pockets.<\/p>\n<p><strong>PMMA provisionals<\/strong> used during the immediate-load phase are softer than zirconia and more susceptible to surface abrasion. Glycine-based air polishing at reduced pressure is appropriate, while sodium bicarbonate powders should be avoided on PMMA surfaces. Ultrasonic instrumentation near PMMA should use low-power settings and non-metal tips to prevent surface crazing.<\/p>\n<p>Across all three materials, the access geometry of the full-arch prosthesis, particularly the tissue clearance beneath the intaglio surface, determines which instruments can reach the implant-abutment interface. A hygienist who has reviewed the exocad design outputs for the patient\u2019s specific restoration knows the access points before any instrument touches the tissue.<\/p>\n<h2>Implementation Checklist: Rolling Out Hygienist Training<\/h2>\n<p>This checklist gives practice owners a structured path to integrating hygienist training into an existing full-arch workflow. Each item maps to a specific operational gap that standard CE often leaves unaddressed.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Audit current hygienist CE records.<\/strong> Identify which team members have completed implant maintenance CE and whether that CE addressed full-arch, screw-retained prosthetics or only single-unit protocols.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Map the existing maintenance workflow.<\/strong> Document who currently performs each maintenance step for full-arch patients, whether dentist, hygienist, or assistant, and identify where the dentist is being pulled in unnecessarily.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Define handoff points for each of the 7 FAM Method steps.<\/strong> For each step, specify who is responsible, what documentation is required, and where the record goes next.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Select material-specific instrumentation for each prosthetic type.<\/strong> Build a tray setup for titanium abutment maintenance, one for zirconia final restorations, and one for PMMA provisional maintenance. Document the air-polishing parameters for each tray.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Establish the post-operative recall schedule.<\/strong> Schedule initial post-operative visits followed by maintenance every 3 to 6 months based on patient risk, and assign these visits to the hygiene team rather than the dentist.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Create a patient home-care instruction protocol specific to full-arch restorations.<\/strong> A 2026 cross-sectional study found that 73% of implant patients were aware of water irrigation devices but only 34.1% used them. This awareness-versus-adoption gap shows why structured, hygienist-delivered education at every recall visit is essential.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Enroll the hygiene team in AGD PACE-approved full-arch CE.<\/strong> Full Arch Masters courses are AGD PACE-approved, with 32 CE credits available per course. Credentialing the hygiene team through a recognized provider creates a documented training record and ensures that implemented protocols remain evidence-based.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Run a team case review after the first 10 full-arch maintenance visits.<\/strong> Identify instrumentation gaps, documentation inconsistencies, and any cases where the dentist was pulled in unnecessarily. Adjust the protocol and retrain as needed.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fullarchmasters.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Enroll your hygiene team in Full Arch Masters.<\/a><\/p>\n<figure style=\"text-align: center\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn.aigrowthmarketer.co\/1780622277683-942b35fded15.jpeg\" alt=\"Full Arch Master&apos;s Flagship Course\" style=\"max-height: 500px\" loading=\"lazy\"><figcaption><em>Full Arch Master&#8217;s Flagship Course<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n<h3>What maintenance intervals protect full-arch restorations best?<\/h3>\n<p>The evidence-based standard for full-arch implant patients is a structured post-operative sequence with frequent initial visits after delivery, followed by ongoing maintenance every 3 to 6 months depending on patient risk. Patients with a history of periodontitis, smoking, or poorly controlled systemic conditions warrant the 3-month interval. Low-risk patients with excellent home care and stable peri-implant tissue may be maintained at 6-month intervals, though many clinicians default to 3 to 4 months for all full-arch patients because of access challenges beneath the prosthesis. As noted earlier, the ACP recommends maintaining full-arch restorations in place rather than removing them at routine intervals, which makes the 3 to 6 month professional cleaning schedule essential for accessing what home care cannot reach. The hygiene team should own the recall schedule and flag any patient who misses an interval for priority rescheduling.<\/p>\n<h3>How does photogrammetry change hygienist handoff points?<\/h3>\n<p>Photogrammetry captures implant positions with a level of accuracy that intraoral scanning alone cannot achieve across a full arch, and that data drives the prosthetic design. For the hygiene team, the practical implication is that the photogrammetry record defines the implant positions under the restoration. A hygienist who has reviewed the photogrammetry outputs knows where each implant is, at what angulation, and how the prosthetic superstructure relates to the underlying tissue. This knowledge changes the handoff point at Step 2, because the hygienist confirms that the photogrammetry data is documented in the patient record and accessible to any clinician performing a future maintenance visit. In a full-team model, this documentation travels with the patient through every recall appointment so a covering hygienist has the same clinical map as the hygienist who was present at delivery.<\/p>\n<h3>When should a hygienist refer a full-arch patient back to the surgeon?<\/h3>\n<p>Referral triggers for full-arch patients fall into prosthetic and peri-implant categories. On the prosthetic side, a hygienist should refer back to the restorative dentist or surgeon when they detect screw loosening, prosthetic mobility, a change in occlusal contacts, or any evidence that the restoration is not fully seated. On the peri-implant side, referral is indicated when probing depths have increased by 2 mm or more from baseline, when bleeding on probing is accompanied by suppuration, when radiographic bone loss is detected at a monitoring interval, or when the patient reports pain or discomfort at an implant site. Peri-implantitis that has progressed beyond mucositis, defined by bone loss beyond the initial remodeling phase, requires surgical intervention that falls outside the hygienist\u2019s scope. Early detection at every maintenance visit keeps referrals manageable, because a hygienist who probes and documents consistently gives the surgeon the earliest possible window for intervention.<\/p>\n<h3>Can hygienists safely use air polishing on zirconia and PMMA full-arch prosthetics?<\/h3>\n<p>Air polishing with glycine powder is safe on zirconia surfaces when applied at the correct distance, angle, and duration. Recommended parameters include an operating distance of 2 to 5 mm, continuous sweeping motion, and short application durations of 5 to 10 seconds per site across major air-polishing devices. Direct application toward the gingival margin or into peri-implant pockets should be avoided. On PMMA provisional restorations, glycine powder at reduced pressure is appropriate, while sodium bicarbonate powders are too abrasive and should not be used. The key distinction for full-arch patients is that the intaglio surface of the prosthesis, the tissue-facing side, is not accessible to air polishing without prosthesis removal. Because the ACP discourages routine removal unless clinical necessity requires it, air polishing is most useful for accessible coronal and interproximal surfaces, not as a substitute for subgingival debridement around the implant-abutment interface.<\/p>\n<h2>Conclusion: Building a Scalable Full-Arch Maintenance System<\/h2>\n<p>The gap between standard hygienist implant CE and the specialized protocols required for screw-retained full-arch prosthetics functions as a real operational constraint. That gap limits how many full-arch cases a practice can protect and scale. A hygienist trained only on single-unit maintenance cannot safely manage zirconia and PMMA surfaces, interpret photogrammetry records, execute FP1-specific protocols, or own the recall system that keeps peri-implantitis rates in the lower range of what current evidence supports.<\/p>\n<p>The FAM Method\u2019s seven-step system, from preoperative records through FP1-specific design and workflow scaling, gives practices a complete, repeatable framework for integrating hygienist training into the full-arch workflow. Each step has defined roles, required inputs, and handoff points that keep the dentist out of non-billable maintenance tasks and the hygiene team working at the top of their scope. The result is a maintenance system that protects implant outcomes and supports the case volume growth that makes full-arch dentistry worth building a practice around.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fullarchmasters.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Start building your scalable maintenance system with Full Arch Masters.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Full Arch Masters&#8217; 7-step FAM Method trains hygienists to maintain full-arch implants confidently. Build your scalable maintenance system today.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":119,"featured_media":323,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-324","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fullarchmasters.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/324","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fullarchmasters.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fullarchmasters.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fullarchmasters.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=324"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.fullarchmasters.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/324\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fullarchmasters.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/323"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fullarchmasters.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=324"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fullarchmasters.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=324"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fullarchmasters.com\/articles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=324"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}